Skip to main content

Post 3- Ramirez et al (2013 & 2015)

By

At a first glance, the two papers appear to build upon each other, primarily since they are by the same researchers and published two years apart. With more insight, it becomes clear that one paper investigates the negative, fear emotions involved in memory whist the later aims to investigate behavioural effect on positive memories. These are two separate paths in the brain brain that may relate to depressive behaviour. Thus, the latter includes information and findings from their previous research for further support, strengthening the understanding of brain regions relation to behaviour.
The paper published in 2013, overall aims to investigate the dentate gyrus and CA1 neurons as well as the amygdala in relation to channelrhodopsin-2 and the effect that these have on false memory creation. The research was conducted on multiple brain areas, which became beneficial as it created an understanding to that optical reactivation of cells was contributing to false memories in different circumstances. We know that humans (in addition to mice) have false memories, seen through fMRI data. However, contrary to mice findings, it is yet unclear about the full pathway of the human hippocampus involved in false memories. Therefore, it becomes questionable as to what extent these mouse model findings can be applied to humans. The hypotheses of the researchers are supported through different experimental manipulations, but since the experiment was conducted in a strict lab setting, the effect that the findings have on natural settings may be taken with caution. Thus, the researchers suggest that their observations are consistent with the Rescorla-Wagner model for two independent conditioned stimuli, a model that is prevalent in both humans and animals. 
Furthermore, in their 2015 paper, Ramirez et al elaborate on brain mechanisms, specifically the hippocampus that involves an expansion to more behavioural and positive memories. They emphasize that animal models exhibit “limited but not quantifiable” behaviours. In addition, the researchers investigate even more brain regions in addition to DG, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and the basolateral amygdala (BLA), all in the attempt to see whether either region exhibited a reduction in depressive behaviours. Their positive memory involved female mouse interactions and the findings also suggested an increase in neurogenesis. Ramirez et al overall claim that depressive behaviours can be reduced by the activation of positive memories in the hippocampus. Thus, they mention that further research is needed to understand why that is. I also believe that other potential scenarios that may yield positive memories in mice, in addition to female mice exposure, could be included in the study for more comprehensive findings. 
Overall, the two papers go hand in hand as the researchers reactivated and stimulated different brain regions in to see if these could alter depressive behaviour of mice. The papers are similar in style and clarity of conveying ideas (since they are written by the same primary authors). However, published in two distinct journals, they differ in section lengths as well as supplementary information.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more