Skip to main content

Post 2: Tye and Chaudhury

By

The two articles, Tye et al. (2012) and Chaudhury et al. (2012), both investigated how manipulating dopamine neurons using optogenetics impacts depression-related behavior, but they came to contradicting conclusions. While Chaudhury’s study discovered that increasing phasic signaling from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) increased depression-related behavior, Tye et al. found that inducing phasic signaling in the same pathway resulted in an decrease in depression-related behavior. Based on the evidence presented in the two studies, it is difficult to decide which I am more inclined to believe as I feel like both articles had flaws.

In my opinion, Chaudhury was more thorough in its methods. By breaking VTA signaling into specific projection routes, VTA to NAcc and VTA to medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), this lead to a more comprehensive approach to the understanding the susceptibility of mice to depressive-related behavior. I would have like to have seen Tye et al. do this. It illustrated that although VTA to NAcc phasic firing resulted in increased depression-related behavior, VTA to mPFC phasic firing resulted in the opposite effect; this shows that it is important not to oversimplify the role of VTA dopamine neurons.

 That being said, I believe that being only using male mice Chaudhury limited these results from being widely accepted, as if we truly to model human behavior, we need to acknowledge that there might be sex differences. Would we expect there to be a different response to the social-defeat stress method if it was a female mouse paired with a breeder? Are breeder mice so naturally territorial that we expect them to attack a new mouse (even a female) put into their habitat every time? Do they do something to the breeder mouse to provoke aggressive behavior? Future directions include incorporating both sexes but also maybe choosing a different method chronic mild stress, such as tail-suspension test from Tye’s article.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more