Skip to main content

Post 2- Dopamine Circuits and Recovery from Stress

By

Tye et al and Chaudhury et al both elaborate on a mechanism available to indicate the relationship between depressive behaviour and dopamine neurons in the brain. Both papers use the methodology of optogenetics in the vental tegmental area (VTA) of the brain. However, the two research groups obtained contrasting conclusions. As this needs to be investigated with more scrutiny, it can primarily be agreed upon that the mechanism of depression is very complex. Depression affects individuals and animals differently, which needs to be taken with large consideration. 
Tye et al used behavioural, pharmacological, optogenetic and electrophysiological methods in mice to investigate the effect that dopamine has on depression, affected by chronic mild stress. They silenced VTA neurons which made normal mice behave as if they were stressed. They then stimulated the VTA with light and found that in this instance animals showed a reduction in time spent struggling and a reduction in anhedonia-like behaviour compared to when no light was present, thereby a sign of depression. This is potentially due to that dopamine neurons were turned off, decreasing the amount of dopamine available which is related to an increase in depressive behaviour. 
Moreover, Chaudhury et al, whose paper is published in the same journal, in the same year, exposed mice and rats to another more intense kind of stress known as social-defeat stress. This more severe kind of stress and depressive behaviour in mice resulted from an increase in VTA firing dopamine activity. It remains very questionable as to how these two papers could have similar procedures and technology and yet yield different results. However, it may be due to that there are many different routes of depression affecting areas of the brain. It may also be possible that the type of stressor affected the rodents’ response. It is also important to note that Chaudhury et al investigated mice only, and Tye et al used mice and rats in their experiment. This could potentially have an overall effect on the difference in results, and may be essential to consider when attempting to apply similar findings to depressive behaviour in humans. 
In a paper by Warden et al, A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge, mPFC was stimulated in rats. The results presented a decrease in depressive behaviour. The study suggests that this is due to serotonin, but it may also be possible that there were circuits involved that relate to the dorsal raphae nucleus (which mPFC projects to). Adding this study to the considerations of Tye and Chaudhury’s findings, it is questionable as to whether serotonin or dopamine or both are the most influential in brain circuits and their relation to depression, again emphasising the complexity of the disorder. 
In summary, the two papers were comprehensive in the investigation of dopamine in depressive like behaviour; however, I yet wonder how they were able to reach such contrasting conclusions. It may potentially be due to the methodology, circuits of the brain, statistics or simply confounding variables, but is yet a large question that remains in the research of depressive behaviour and optogenetics. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more