Skip to main content

Post 1: Rodent Models of Neurogenesis and Antidepressants

By

Santarelli et al. (2003) and Bessa et al. (2009) both investigate the theory that antidepressants increase neurogenesis and/or neural plasticity in the hippocampus of depressed patients. While both articles support the role of stress in inducing depression, that depression may decrease neural plasticity, and that antidepressants promote neural plasticity, they disagree on whether increased neurogenesis is required for the behavioral and molecular benefits of antidepressants.

Both Santarelli and Bessa use rodents as models to analyze the link between neurogenesis and the behavioral and molecular effects of antidepressants, but Bessa’s article demonstrates clearer, more advanced methods and analysis, reflective of its later publication. For one, Santarelli primarily uses novelty-suppressed feeding (NSF) as a behavioral assay for depression, while Bessa uses a sucrose preference test and forced swimming test for depression, as well as an NSF test for anxiety. The use of NSF alone is insufficient as a behavioral measure of depression as it is representative of anxiety; while anxiety and depression and highly co-morbid, they are not mutually exclusive, and it is thus flawed to make conclusions about depressive behaviors using NSF alone. Additionally, Santarelli’s use of X-irradiation as a way to prevent neurogenesis in the hippocampus may produce confounding factors due to its ability to induce unpredictable mutations and inflammation. Bessa specifically points out the possible problems with X-rays and elects instead to use methylazoxymethanol (MAM) to block neurogenesis.

The articles’ understanding and application of neural plasticity also may contribute to their opposing conclusions: Santarelli’s paper suggests that only neurogenesis—the creation of new neurons in hippocampal regions—is under consideration for the effects of antidepressants whereas Bessa takes on a broader definition of neural plasticity that includes many changes in neuronal morphology in both the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Santarelli’s measurement of neurogenesis in terms of amounts of new cells (i.e. “doubling of BrdU-labeled cells in WT mice”) is also vague and creates some ambiguity. The more precise measurements of neural volume, dendritic length, number of dendrites, dendritic branching, spine type ratio, and neuron number in specific brain regions and neuron types by Bessa lead to a much clearer representation of the structural changes that accompany depression, neural plasticity, and antidepressant use.

Through these differential methods and analyses, Santarelli and Bessa come to alternative conclusions, with Bessa coming to the more prudent conclusion that adult neurogenesis is not necessary for antidepressants to elicit its behavioral effects. Today, over 10 years after the publication of Bessa’s paper, the cause of depression, actions of antidepressants, and extent of adult neurogenesis in humans is still under dispute. While these experiments could not solve these mysteries, they succeeded in supporting previous discoveries and contributing to research on one of the most common psychological disorders of modern times.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more