Skip to main content

Post 1: Rodent Models of Neurogenesis and Antidepressants


Santarelli et al. (2003) and Bessa et al. (2009) both investigate the theory that antidepressants increase neurogenesis and/or neural plasticity in the hippocampus of depressed patients. While both articles support the role of stress in inducing depression, that depression may decrease neural plasticity, and that antidepressants promote neural plasticity, they disagree on whether increased neurogenesis is required for the behavioral and molecular benefits of antidepressants.

Both Santarelli and Bessa use rodents as models to analyze the link between neurogenesis and the behavioral and molecular effects of antidepressants, but Bessa’s article demonstrates clearer, more advanced methods and analysis, reflective of its later publication. For one, Santarelli primarily uses novelty-suppressed feeding (NSF) as a behavioral assay for depression, while Bessa uses a sucrose preference test and forced swimming test for depression, as well as an NSF test for anxiety. The use of NSF alone is insufficient as a behavioral measure of depression as it is representative of anxiety; while anxiety and depression and highly co-morbid, they are not mutually exclusive, and it is thus flawed to make conclusions about depressive behaviors using NSF alone. Additionally, Santarelli’s use of X-irradiation as a way to prevent neurogenesis in the hippocampus may produce confounding factors due to its ability to induce unpredictable mutations and inflammation. Bessa specifically points out the possible problems with X-rays and elects instead to use methylazoxymethanol (MAM) to block neurogenesis.

The articles’ understanding and application of neural plasticity also may contribute to their opposing conclusions: Santarelli’s paper suggests that only neurogenesis—the creation of new neurons in hippocampal regions—is under consideration for the effects of antidepressants whereas Bessa takes on a broader definition of neural plasticity that includes many changes in neuronal morphology in both the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Santarelli’s measurement of neurogenesis in terms of amounts of new cells (i.e. “doubling of BrdU-labeled cells in WT mice”) is also vague and creates some ambiguity. The more precise measurements of neural volume, dendritic length, number of dendrites, dendritic branching, spine type ratio, and neuron number in specific brain regions and neuron types by Bessa lead to a much clearer representation of the structural changes that accompany depression, neural plasticity, and antidepressant use.

Through these differential methods and analyses, Santarelli and Bessa come to alternative conclusions, with Bessa coming to the more prudent conclusion that adult neurogenesis is not necessary for antidepressants to elicit its behavioral effects. Today, over 10 years after the publication of Bessa’s paper, the cause of depression, actions of antidepressants, and extent of adult neurogenesis in humans is still under dispute. While these experiments could not solve these mysteries, they succeeded in supporting previous discoveries and contributing to research on one of the most common psychological disorders of modern times.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...

Sial & Allsop

Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...

Buffington and Reber

Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...