Skip to main content

Paper Response #2: Dopamine Circuits and Stress Recovery

By

WEEK 3: Jan. 27 Papers (Chaudhury et. al, Tye et. al)

The Chaudhury et. al and Tye et. al papers both examine how dopamine neurons modulate depression-related behaviors in rodents. The papers differ greatly in terms of the results found, with the Chaudhury paper claiming that increased phasic firing in Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) dopamine neurons heightens depression-related behaviors, while the Tye paper states inhibition of these same neurons induces depression-related behaviors. Furthermore, the Chaudhury paper found that inhibiting dopaminergic projections from the VTA to the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) reduced depressive behaviors, but the Tye paper found this increased depressive behaviors, and vice versa. However, differences between the two studies in how the research was conducted and the specific factors that were examined may account for some of the contrasting results.

For starters, Chaudhury’s study only experimented on mice, whereas Tye’s study carried out some of their research on mice and some of it on rats. While these species are very similar, we cannot rule out the possibility of mild differences between them accounting for some of the disparity in results. Additionally, while both studies used the Sucrose Preference Test (SPT) as a measure of anhedonia indicative of depressive behavior, the Chaudhury study used social interaction as their second measure of depression, whereas the Tye study examined motivation as exhibited during the Tail Suspension Test (TST) instead. It is important to note here that depression is a complex, multifactorial disorder characterized by a wide array of symptoms that need not all be present in a given patient for them to qualify for diagnosis. Therefore, neither lack of motivation nor reduced social interaction can be considered fully encompassing, definitive measures of depression. Since social interaction and motivation are two very different behavioral phenotypes of depression that may have different causal roots including but also going beyond dopaminergic intervention, they cannot be directly compared to one another.  

Most importantly, the studies used different experimental paradigms to elicit depressive states in the rodents. Chaudhury employed the Social-Defeat (SD) Paradigm, but Tye used the Chronic Mild Stress (CMS) Paradigm. Both authors agreed that context and severity of the stress experienced greatly influence the stress-regulating role of dopamine neuron firing rates, with different kinds of stressors evoking contrasting reactions from dopaminergic neurons in the VTA. Specifically, the papers were in agreement that chronic mild stressors such as those used in the Tye study’s CMS paradigm inhibit the activity of VTA neurons, while more severe stressors such as those in the Chaudhury study’s SD paradigm increase activity. This strikes me as the most important difference between the studies and likely the leading reason behind the disparity in results. It is quite possible that both studies have valid results despite seemingly being in direct opposition to each other, as they are really investigating different (but related) stress-related processes. This is a good reminder that neural processes are often complex and play varying roles depending on the situation even within the same neural circuit. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more