Skip to main content

Post 1- Neurogenesis & Anti-depressant Actions

By

The two papers by Santarelli et al and Bessa et al aim to investigate the impact that antidepressants have on behavioural effects towards depressive disorders in relation to neurogenesis and neuronal plasticity. The treatment of antidepressants (ADs) discussed include fluoxetine, imipramine, desipramine, halodperidol, vehicle, and two putative antidepressants. Although the findings of the two appear concise, Santarelli et al do not present methodology in a similar coherent manner as Bessa et al, which may reduce its comprehensiveness somewhat. In contrast, Bessa et al present an extensive section indicating the materials and methodology used (such as the subjects, conditions and measurement technologies/tests).
 In the research conducted by Santarelli et al, emphasis is placed on the neurotransmitters serotonin (5HT) and noradrenaline (NA), claimed to increase in levels as a response to antidepressants. This may indicate enhancement in brain mobilization but also an improvement in appetite, as these are the predominant roles of the neurotransmitters. Bessa et al do not discuss these neurotransmitters as abundant. However, they instead investigated anhedonia each week with use of a sucrose preference test. In depressed subjects, when anhedonia was reduced and treated with antidepressants, which in turn increase serotonin levels (and influences appetite), there was an improvement in the sucrose preference test result. Bessa et al state that chronic mild stress can influence behavioural responses in relation to ADs. They also challenge Santarelli’s belief of neurogenesis being a direct cause to behavioural effects of antidepressants. Their findings instead suggest that even when there is a blockage in neurogenesis (tested with MAM), there is still evidence towards efficiency in alleviating depressive symptoms with ADs. Bessa et al thereby claim that neuronal plasticity, dendritic and spine density is a larger influence to depressive behaviour than neurogenesis.  With more focus on the biochemical imbalances of the neurotransmitters involved in the monoamine hypothesis (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine), Bessa et al would be adding more up to date findings building upon the previous research by Santarelli et al. 
In summary, reading the two papers created a greater understanding towards how different publications can build on each other over time. These two studies provide more coherent and supportive evidence to a common treatment such as antidepressants used in mice and its potential effect on human patients. Behavior is certainly affected by antidepressant treatment, thus the main contrast between the two findings is their respective causal factors within the brain. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more