Skip to main content

Effects of Anti-Depressants, Bessa & Santarelli

By

            Santarelli et al reported two results: (1) fluoxetine induces hippocampal neurogenesis and reduces latency to feed in the NSF test via 5-HT1A receptors and (2) hippocampal irradiation halts neurogenesis in the subgranular zone (SGZ), causing fluoxetine to have no anti-depressant effect. Santarelli’s experiments were elegantly done, but I’m not convinced that neurogenesis is the cause of the effects seen from fluoxetine. Using 5HT1A-R knockout mice demonstrated that chronic treatment with fluoxetine is sufficient to reduce latency to feed in WT mice; however, the same effect is seen using 8-OH-DPAT, a 5HT1A-selective agonist. How do we know if the fluoxetine-induced neurogenesis and its anti-depressant effects are independent of each other or not? If fluoxetine and 8-OH-DPAT have the same effects, couldn’t the reduced latency to feed be caused solely by agonists binding 5HT1A receptors? Neurogenesis occurs, but there’s no timeline of when it happened relative to the decreased latency to feed occurred.
            Similar to their first results, Santarelli et al show data that the number of BrdU+ cells decrease following hippocampal irradiation, but they do not say if 5HT1A receptors are affected by the radiation, nor do they specify which strain of mice they irradiate. Therefore, isn’t it possible that the radiation is simply damaging 5HT1A receptors, which then prevents fluoxetine from working? If a method to quantify the amount of 5HT1A receptors exists, I would have liked to see these data in Santarelli’s experiment.
            Bessa et al reported data mainly in opposition to Santarelli. Namely, Bessa reported that neurogenesis was important for the behavioral effects seen from using anti-depressants, but not for the mechanism of the drug itself. Using MAM as a method of arresting neurogenesis is, in my opinion, a more reliable method than irradiation. Bessa’s data also imply that restoration of synaptic contacts was the possible mechanism by which anti-depressants were working. This raises the question: Before the administration of anti-depressants, could synaptic remodeling occur outside of the hippocampus and PFC to mediate depressive-like behaviors? Other pathways in the brain that are involved in stress and fear may be strengthened and weakened under stressful conditions or with anti-depressant treatments.
            The Santarelli and Bessa paper provide a good overview of the possible effects that symptoms of depression and anti-depressants may have on the brain. However, there is no definitive mechanism of depression or its treatment that has been identified, thus indicating the need for further research. New techniques such as DREADDS, optogenetics, or genetic knockouts of Ncam1 or Syn1 genes could provide more specific results about the function of the hippocampus and PFC in depression.  



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more