Skip to main content

Blog Post 1: Neurogenesis & Anti-depressant Actions

By

Santarelli and Bessa et al propose two conflicting opinions on the mechanisms of action for antidepressant drugs. The research itself and how it is reported contains two comparable styles. Santarelli et al does not provide a methods section or detailed statistical analysis. Both studies start by showing that antidepressant drugs (ADs) do indeed have a chronic positive effect of depressive symptoms. Santarelli shows this using only one behavioral test: the novelty suppressed feeding test. Bessa et al uses three behavioral tests (sucrose preference test, forced swim task, and novelty suppressed feeding), and specifically delineates the timelines that each drug works (all 1 week except Fluoxetine takes 2 weeks to take effect). The papers then diverge in style, methods, and ideas. Santarelli’s article jumps to show that Fluoxetine increases BrdU positive cells in the dentate gyrus, and attempt to link this to the idea that hippocampal neurogenesis is the mechanism by which the mice’s behavior is improved. To further prove their point, they aim to irradiate the SGZ area of the dentate gyrus which had been previously shown to integrate into hippocampal activity. Using X-Rays to cause irradiation, they observe that ADs do not ameliorate the depressive symptoms compared to controls. This leads to the conclusion that hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in mood regulation and is needed for anti-depressants to work.

Bessa et al questions Santarelli’s hypothesis and suggest that it is not hippocampal neurogenesis that is responsible for the mechanism underlying ADs, but instead neuronal remodeling and synaptic connections. The paper itself is broken down into clear sections, detailed methods, and an in depth statistical analysis explanation. The results indicate that while there is hippocampal neurogenesis, this cannot be assumed to be the cause of a correlation. They use MAM, a cytostatic agent, instead of X-Rays, which can cause inflammation, to stop neurogenesis. The researchers find that antidepressants reduce depressive symptoms to the same extent in vehicle and MAM treated animals. This disputes Santarrelli’s hypothesis. In addition, they find it is dendritic and spine density that is most affected and depleted when examining depressive symptoms. It is the volume of the hippocampus and PFC that was altered, not the number of neurons, indicating the connections and networks are changed. Bessa et al looked at more brain regions, performed more stains, analysis, and measures, and ultimately provided better evidence that antidepressants work through a mechanism related to synaptic plasticity and not neurogenesis.

It is evident that more recent literature has grown from Bessa et al’s research as depression research has shifted to networks rather than individual structures. Limitations of these studies include the inability to completely and wholly translate the depressive and anxious symptoms of the mice to humans. Further steps would be to explore these mechanisms more in depth and understand specifically how antidepressants trigger synaptic plasticity. Overall, I found these papers very interesting in that they provided a historical glance into much of the current literature we read and the conflict that got us here.
   


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more